What is bakhiya shadow work in chikankari, and why must the closed herringbone stitch be worked from the wrong side of the muslin rather than the right side?

Bakhiya is the shadow work stitch that is the structural core of chikankari embroidery, and it is a specific application of a stitch type known variously as closed herringbone stitch or double back stitch. The defining characteristic of bakhiya is not the stitch itself — closed herringbone can be worked from either face of a fabric — but the deliberate choice to work it from the wrong side of a sheer fabric, typically very fine cotton muslin, so that the crossing diagonal legs of the herringbone appear as a shadow on the right side filtered through the translucent weave. The structural mechanics of closed herringbone require understanding the two-sided relationship between stitch geometry and working face. On the side of the fabric the embroiderer works from, the stitch appears as crossing diagonal legs that span the interior of the design shape. Each stitch diagonally crosses the shape from one edge to the other, alternating between the upper-right-to-lower-left direction and the upper-left-to-lower-right direction, producing a continuous X-crossing pattern that fills the design interior. On the opposite face, the same stitch appears as two rows of back stitch running parallel along the upper and lower edges of the design shape. The back stitch rows are the anchoring stitches that each diagonal leg uses as its starting and ending point — the needle enters and exits at the upper design edge alternately with the lower design edge, and each insertion point is a back stitch that shares its location with the previous stitch's exit point. In bakhiya worked on the wrong side of muslin, the embroiderer faces the crossing diagonal pattern. The public right face shows the two parallel rows of back stitch as a fine outline running along the design edges, and between those outline rows, the crossing diagonal stitches are visible through the sheer muslin as a shadow. The word 'shadow' is precise: the thread color appears lighter and more diffuse on the right face than the thread's actual color, because the muslin weave partially filters the color of the thread behind it. The degree of color filtering depends on the muslin thread count, the weave density, and the thread color — very fine muslin at high thread count produces a more pronounced shadow effect (lighter apparent color, more diffuse shape boundary) because more muslin threads lie between the observer and the bakhiya threads. Coarser muslin produces a less filtered, more directly visible stitch. The reason for working from the wrong side is a combination of visual and technical factors. Visually, working from the wrong side means that all thread starts, thread ends, knot placements, and stitch-to-stitch transition paths remain on the wrong side. A finished bakhiya piece viewed from the right side shows only the shadow fill and the backstitch outline — no thread tails, no knot bumps, no connecting floats. The right face is clean because every non-design thread path is deliberately placed on the wrong face. Technically, working from the wrong side means the embroiderer can see the crossing pattern developing as they work, can count stitches, can verify that the diagonals are crossing correctly and that the design shape is filling consistently. A practitioner who works the bakhiya from the right side — working closed herringbone into the wrong-side face — produces a structurally identical result but must work with a visually inverted stitch geometry (seeing the back stitch lines as they work rather than the crossing diagonals), which is typically harder to control and less intuitive for stitch count management. The most common error in bakhiya is open herringbone (working the stitch with gaps between diagonal legs rather than closing them end-to-end). Open herringbone from the wrong side produces a result on the right face where the backstitch rows are not continuous — there are visible gaps between each successive back stitch — and the crossing diagonal pattern on the right face appears sparse and irregular rather than filling the design shape evenly. The diagnostic for open vs. closed herringbone is visible on the working (wrong) side before the piece is finished: each diagonal stitch must begin where the previous stitch ended (closed), not beside it (open). For Patreon patterns in chikankari, the working face must be specified — wrong side means the shadow effect, right side means the crossing pattern is on the public face, which is a different aesthetic entirely and technically different to execute.

What is the structural difference between phanda and murri stitches in chikankari, and how does the return insertion angle and distance from the exit point create the rice-grain shape in murri versus the round dot in phanda?

Phanda and murri are two textural stitches in chikankari that serve as accent elements — small raised knots or dots that add dimensional punctuation to design areas otherwise worked in flat shadow stitches. They are visually distinct: phanda produces a round dot; murri produces an elongated rice-grain shape. They are worked with different needle mechanics, and the difference is not a matter of wrap count alone. Both stitches are affected by thread tension, needle diameter, and fabric weave count, but their primary structural difference lies in the spatial relationship between the stitch's exit point and re-entry point, and in the wrap count around the needle shaft. Phanda is chikankari's French knot. The needle exits the fabric at the intended dot center. The working thread wraps around the needle shaft twice. The needle is then re-inserted into the fabric immediately adjacent to the exit point — close enough to form a tight knot but not through the same hole (which would pull the wrapped thread back through without knotting). The thread is held taut over the needle with the non-working hand as the needle is drawn through the fabric, which causes the two wraps to close against the fabric surface in a tight knot. The result is a round, symmetrical dot whose diameter is approximately proportional to the thread diameter multiplied by the wrap count. A double wrap produces a substantially rounder and larger dot than a single wrap because the second wrap of thread adds diameter in two dimensions around the needle shaft simultaneously. The roundness of phanda is determined by how symmetrically the wraps distribute around the needle shaft and how evenly the thread tension is maintained during needle withdrawal. Uneven tension during withdrawal causes one portion of the double wrap to close more tightly than another, producing an asymmetric or comma-shaped dot rather than a round one. The correct technique holds the working thread perpendicular to the fabric surface (straight up from the exit point) during needle insertion and keeps this perpendicular hold until the needle tip has cleared the fabric, after which the thread can be gently released. Murri differs in two specific ways. First, the wrap count is one, not two. Second, and this is the defining difference, the needle does not re-enter the fabric adjacent to the exit point. Instead, the needle re-enters at a distance from the exit point, along the grain line of the design element, and at an angle such that the single wrap of thread is drawn into an elongated configuration as the needle exits through the fabric. The geometry is as follows: the needle exits the fabric at point A. The thread wraps once around the needle shaft. The needle re-enters the fabric at point B, which is located along the intended orientation of the rice grain and at a distance of approximately three to five thread-widths from point A (the precise distance determines the aspect ratio of the finished grain). As the needle is drawn through from point B, the single wrap of thread is elongated by the distance between A and B — the thread must lie flat across that distance before the knot closes, and it closes into an elongated oval rather than a round knot. The longer the A-to-B distance, the longer the finished grain. The shorter the A-to-B distance (approaching adjacent re-entry as in phanda), the shorter and rounder the grain, approaching phanda's round shape. A murri worked with the re-entry point exactly the same distance as a phanda but with only one wrap will produce a shape somewhere between phanda and a short rice grain — slightly elongated due to the smaller knot mass from the single wrap. The direction of the A-to-B line in the fabric determines the orientation of the rice grain relative to the design — in chikankari motifs, murri stitches in a petal or leaf element are typically oriented radially (pointing toward the center of the motif or along the curve of the petal edge), which requires planning the A-to-B direction for each stitch position within the design. Common errors in murri: re-entering too close to the exit (producing round phanda-like dots instead of grains), using too long an A-to-B distance (producing long loose grains that lie flat and do not have the characteristic slightly raised profile), or varying the A-to-B distance inconsistently across a group of murri stitches (producing grains of different lengths in a design element that should have uniform grain size). For Patreon documentation, the A-to-B distance in thread-widths must be specified for each pattern that uses murri, because thread diameter varies between cotton thread sizes and a distance specified in millimetres may produce different aspect ratios with different thread weights. Specifying the distance in thread-widths provides a self-scaling specification that remains consistent across thread diameters.

How does jali in chikankari differ from drawn thread work, and what determines the minimum aperture size and grid regularity of a jali pattern?

Jali is chikankari's openwork technique, and the single most important structural fact about jali that distinguishes it from the superficially similar drawn thread openwork found in other embroidery traditions is that jali does not remove any threads from the fabric. Every warp thread and every weft thread that existed in the muslin before the jali was worked remains in the fabric after the jali is completed. The mesh appearance of jali is produced entirely by thread displacement — moving existing threads apart from their original positions — not by thread removal. In drawn thread work (used in Hardanger, some Eastern European folk embroidery traditions, and cutwork techniques), specific warp or weft threads are cut at a distance from the design boundaries and pulled free from the fabric body. The threads that remain after removal define the structural grid of the openwork, and the removed threads are gone. The mesh areas in drawn thread work have negative space where nothing exists — the holes are true vacancies in the fabric structure. In jali, by contrast, the holes are bounded areas where threads have been pushed apart. Every intersection in the jali grid is formed by two groups of threads that have been displaced to the edges of that intersection — the warp threads that were originally running through the hole area are now pushed to one side of it, and the weft threads are pushed to the other side. The threads are present; they have moved. This structural difference has practical consequences for fabric behavior and for the durability of the openwork. A drawn thread piece loses structural integrity at the openwork areas because actual structural material has been removed — repeated stretching, washing, and wear can cause adjacent non-removed threads to migrate into the emptied space and produce distortion. A jali piece retains all its original thread material; the displaced threads at the edges of each hole remain under the tension of the surrounding fabric structure and actively resist further displacement during wear. The displaced holes in jali do not grow larger with use under normal conditions. The securing stitches worked around each displaced hole are the mechanism by which the displaced thread positions are locked. After the stiletto or needle tip is used to push the threads apart at an intersection, a running stitch or back stitch is worked around the perimeter of the displaced hole, catching the displaced thread bundles on all four sides of the hole and anchoring them in their new separated positions. Without securing stitches, the displaced threads would return to their original positions under the fabric's internal thread tension as soon as the stiletto is withdrawn. The securing stitch is typically a fine thread matching the fabric, worked in a close chain or running pattern that visually reads as a framing element around each aperture. The grid regularity of jali is determined by the regularity of the muslin weave itself. In a plain weave muslin with uniform thread spacing, the intersections where thread displacement is possible form a perfectly regular grid with spacing equal to the thread pitch of the muslin — the center-to-center distance between adjacent threads. If the muslin has twenty-four warp threads per centimetre and twenty-four weft threads per centimetre, the minimum possible jali grid unit (the smallest hole that can be displaced) is one intersection wide and one intersection tall — approximately four warp threads and four weft threads grouped at the aperture edges, with one thread pitch of open space at the center. This means the minimum aperture diameter is approximately equal to one thread pitch (the inverse of the threads per centimetre count). A muslin with finer thread count (more threads per centimetre) has smaller thread pitch, and therefore the minimum jali aperture can be smaller — the holes can be finer. A coarser muslin (fewer threads per centimetre, larger thread pitch) produces a minimum aperture that is necessarily larger. The practical implication for Patreon documentation is that the fabric specification must include thread count (or threads per centimetre) as a structural parameter that determines what jali patterns are achievable. A jali pattern designed on fine tanzeb muslin at high thread count will not be reproducible on standard cotton quilting fabric at low thread count — the holes will be larger than intended and the grid will look coarser. This is not a substitution that can be compensated by altering technique; it is a fabric-structure parameter. Hath jali (hand jali) requires higher thread counts than machine-woven fine cotton because the degree of precision required for small displaced holes exceeds what coarser weaves support. Makra jali (spider jali) builds a secondary pattern by working additional stitches across the displaced holes, connecting the securing stitch borders on adjacent sides to create a diagonal crossing in the hole interior — this secondary construction is possible only when the hole is large enough to accommodate the needle passage across its interior without the surrounding securing stitches impeding the needle path.

How are the thirty-two named chikankari stitches categorized into structural types, and what determines whether a design element should use flat shadow, openwork jali, or raised mota stitching?

The thirty-two recognized chikankari stitches are traditionally organized into three structural categories that reflect the three fundamental ways a stitch can relate to the fabric plane: it can lie within the fabric plane as a surface pattern (flat-and-shadow stitches), it can create structured open space by displacing fabric threads (openwork stitches), or it can build above the fabric plane as a dimensional raised element (mota stitches, from the Urdu word for thick or substantial). Understanding which category applies to a given design element is more than an aesthetic decision — each category has different thread requirements, different fabric interaction mechanics, and different documentation needs for Patreon patterns. The flat-and-shadow category includes bakhiya (closed herringbone shadow work), ulta bakhiya (reverse shadow work, worked from the right side and producing a different visual quality — the crossing pattern is directly on the right face without fabric filtering, producing a heavier, more opaque fill than standard bakhiya), phanda, murri, keel (a chain stitch variant worked in a detached manner for floral centers and accents), sidhaul (stem stitch used for curved design outlines and branch elements), pechni (a running stitch fill used for broad interior areas where solid fill is needed), and several additional stitches including rahet (a filling chain stitch) and bakhia (a simple running stitch visible on both faces). These stitches produce results that are either flat against the fabric surface or (in the case of bakhiya) interact optically with the fabric by being behind it. Thread for flat-and-shadow stitches is typically a fine cotton thread (historically, locally spun and hand-twisted cotton; now commercially available as DMC 25 or equivalent in the appropriate weight), and the thread should be fine enough that it does not distort the muslin weave when passing through it — coarser thread dragged through fine muslin abrades and weakens the muslin at each needle penetration. The openwork category is dominated by jali and its variants. Jali creates the characteristic mesh windows that appear in chikankari sarees, kurtas, and dupattas as geometric lattice patterns. The named jali variants differ primarily in the pattern of the secondary securing stitches and the arrangement of the displaced holes — different named jali patterns produce different visual mesh geometries from the same underlying thread displacement mechanics. Hath jali (hand jali, also called simple jali) creates evenly spaced displaced holes in a regular grid with simple securing stitches. Makra jali (spider jali) adds the diagonal crossing stitch across the interior of each hole to create a spider-web-like secondary pattern visible within each aperture. Jaali-kash is a pulled thread technique that uses needle tension (pulling tight stitches through the fabric) rather than a stiletto to displace threads, producing a more fabric-integrated result where the hole edges are more closely bound by the stitching. The choice between jali variants for a design element depends on the size of the design window, the intended visual density, and the thread count of the muslin. The mota (raised) category includes stitches that build dimensional height above the fabric surface. Tepchi is a running stitch worked in multiple parallel rows as a padding foundation — the parallel running stitch rows create a slightly raised padded surface into which subsequent stitches are worked, raising them above the base fabric plane. Ghas patti (grass or leaf stitch) is a padded stitch worked over tepchi padding that produces a raised, smooth-surfaced leaf or grass blade with a dimensional profile visible in raking light and tactilely distinguishable from the surrounding fabric surface. Banana stitch is worked in a curve and produces a curved raised element resembling a banana shape. Murri, when worked over a small padding of tepchi running stitches, becomes a raised murri with greater height than the standard flat murri described above. The practical implications for Patreon documentation are significant. A design that combines all three categories — bakhiya shadow fill, jali openwork windows, and mota raised accents — requires three different thread specifications (because mota stitches typically use a heavier thread to build dimensional height faster), three different needle sizes (to avoid distorting the muslin with the heavier thread), and three different sequencing protocols (mota raised elements should generally be worked last in a multi-category design because the dimensional height of the mota elements can interfere with the working needle path for adjacent flat stitches; jali windows should be worked before any surrounding bakhiya fill because the stiletto displacement tool can distort flat stitches already in place if they adjoin the jali area; bakhiya fill should be worked after all outlines are established). These sequencing requirements must be documented in Patreon patterns because a student working in the wrong sequence can accidentally distort or damage completed work. For example, working jali after adjacent bakhiya has been completed means the stiletto must navigate around existing completed stitches at the jali boundary, which frequently causes accidental distortion of bakhiya diagonal legs at the jali edge — visible as misaligned or bent diagonal legs in the shadow area immediately adjacent to the jali mesh. The correct sequence (outline first, jali next, bakhiya fill last, mota last of all) is not recoverable once violated — distorted stitches in fine muslin cannot be removed and re-worked without leaving fabric damage at the penetration points.

Explainers

Patreon for chikankari embroidery creators: how bakhiya shadow work uses closed herringbone stitched from the wrong side of sheer muslin so the crossing diagonal legs appear filtered through the fabric on the right face and all thread manipulation remains on the reverse, the structural difference between phanda (round dot from double wrap and adjacent re-entry) and murri (rice-grain shape from single wrap and angled re-entry at a measured distance because insertion distance determines grain aspect ratio), how jali pulled-thread openwork displaces warp and weft threads at existing intersections and locks each displaced hole with securing stitches rather than removing threads as drawn thread work does, the three categories of the thirty-two named chikankari stitches, muslin thread count as the jali aperture floor, and the blue taash block transfer and why the carved design must be a mirror image

2026-09-17 · ~5,700 words

Chikankari embroidery tutorial videos show the hand in motion — the needle passing through muslin, the thread pulling into a knot or stitch — but they rarely stop to state which face of the fabric the embroiderer is working from, why that face matters structurally, or what the mechanical difference is between a phanda and a murri at the level of where the needle re-enters relative to where it exited. Bakhiya shadow work is worked from the wrong side of the fabric by design; murri differs from phanda not in thread wraps alone but in the distance and angle of the return insertion; jali creates openwork by displacing threads that remain in the fabric rather than removing them; and the taash block that transfers the design must be carved as the lateral reverse of the intended pattern because the ink impression reverses when the block contacts the fabric. This post documents the mechanical layer that most chikankari video instruction compresses, the structural variables that must be specified to make a chikankari pattern reproducible, and the Apple Tax that iOS-heavy embroidery audiences will impose on creator revenue from November 2026.

Bakhiya shadow work: closed herringbone from the wrong side, why the working face determines the visual effect, and why all thread manipulation must remain on the reverse

Bakhiya is the shadow work stitch that most characterizes chikankari embroidery at a technical level. It is a specific application of closed herringbone stitch — also called double back stitch — but the distinguishing feature of bakhiya is not the stitch structure itself. Closed herringbone can be worked from either face of a fabric and will produce recognizable herringbone geometry on both sides. The distinguishing feature of bakhiya is the deliberate choice of working face: bakhiya is worked from the wrong side of a sheer fabric, specifically fine cotton muslin, so that the visible right side shows the crossing diagonal stitches filtered through the translucent weave as a shadow, not directly as a surface pattern.

The geometry of closed herringbone is the same whether worked from right or wrong side. Each stitch crosses the interior of the design shape diagonally. The stitches alternate direction — upper-right to lower-left, then upper-left to lower-right — and each successive stitch begins where the previous stitch ended. The entry and exit points at the design edges form the anchor points of the stitch. When two consecutive stitches share an anchor point exactly — each stitch ending at the same point where the next begins — the stitch is closed herringbone. When consecutive stitches do not share anchor points — each ending at a point beside the next stitch's start — the stitch is open herringbone, which produces a different visual result and is not bakhiya.

The two-sided difference that makes bakhiya work as shadow work is as follows. The face the embroiderer works from shows the crossing diagonal legs of the herringbone pattern filling the design shape. The opposite face shows two parallel rows of back stitch running along the upper and lower edges of the design shape. These two rows of back stitch are what the crossing diagonal stitches look like from behind: each anchor point at the design edge, seen from the back, appears as a back stitch because two consecutive diagonal legs share that anchor point, and the thread overlap at a shared point reads as a back stitch from the reverse.

When the embroiderer works from the wrong side (as in bakhiya), the public right face shows the two rows of back stitch as fine parallel outline lines running along the design boundary, and the crossing diagonal stitches behind the muslin are visible through the sheer fabric as a shadow. The shadow quality arises because muslin is translucent: each crossing diagonal leg is behind the fabric weave, and the fabric threads partially block and scatter the light reflected from the embroidery thread. The thread color appears lighter on the right face than its actual color, and the design edges appear as a soft gradient rather than a hard boundary. This diffuse, lighter appearance is the “shadow” in shadow work.

The degree of shadow filtering — how much lighter the bakhiya appears on the right face compared to the thread's actual color — depends on the muslin thread count and the weave density. A very fine muslin at high thread count (more threads per centimetre) places more muslin yarn between the observer and the bakhiya threads, producing stronger filtering and a more pronounced shadow effect. Coarser muslin at low thread count filters less, and the bakhiya stitches appear more directly visible through the fabric, approaching the appearance of unfiltered surface embroidery. Traditional chikankari used extremely fine mulmul (muslin) with thread counts that placed it in the category of the finest plain-weave cottons produced anywhere; the most celebrated historic Lucknow chikankari pieces on tanzeb muslin show shadow work so fine that the stitches are almost invisible in direct light and emerge fully only in raking light.

The practical advantage of working from the wrong side is that all thread starts, thread ends, knot placements, and thread-to-thread transitions remain on the wrong face. A bakhiya piece viewed from the right side has no thread ends, no knot bumps, and no connecting floats visible. The right face is clean because every stitch management action is performed on the wrong side. A chikankari creator who works bakhiya from the right side (which produces the same stitch geometry from the reverse perspective) must manage thread ends on the public face, which is both technically harder and visually less clean in the finished result.

The most instructionally important specification for bakhiya in any Patreon pattern or tutorial is working face: the pattern must state “work from wrong side” explicitly. Working from the right side produces a different visual result (the crossing diagonal pattern on the public face rather than shadow-through-fabric) and is a different technique entirely. These are not stylistic variants of the same instruction; they produce structurally different outcomes. A student who works closed herringbone from the right side when the pattern intends bakhiya shadow work will produce a piece that differs from the intended result in every visual parameter, and the error cannot be corrected without removing the stitching entirely.

Phanda and murri: the structural mechanics that distinguish a round French-knot dot from a rice-grain shape, and why the exit-to-re-entry distance is the primary design variable

Phanda and murri are chikankari’s two dimensional-dot stitches. Both produce small raised knots on the fabric surface that add textural contrast to areas of flat shadow work or jali openwork. Both require the thread to wrap around the needle shaft before the needle re-enters the fabric. Both are fundamentally simple stitches that nonetheless require precise control to produce consistent results. The difference between them is specific: phanda produces a symmetrical round dot; murri produces an elongated rice-grain shape. The mechanical variable that determines which result is produced is the spatial relationship between the exit point (where the needle came up from the fabric) and the re-entry point (where the needle goes back into the fabric after the wrap).

Phanda is chikankari’s French knot. The needle exits the fabric at the intended dot center. The working thread wraps around the needle shaft twice. The needle re-enters the fabric immediately adjacent to the exit point — close enough to form a tight knot when the thread is drawn through, but not re-entering through the exact same hole, which would pull the wrapped thread back through the fabric without closing the knot. As the needle is drawn through the fabric, the working thread is held with mild tension over the needle to prevent the wraps from sliding off the needle tip before they have passed partially through the hole. The two wraps close against the fabric surface in a compact, nearly spherical knot. The diameter of the finished phanda dot is approximately proportional to the thread diameter multiplied by the wrap count plus the knot closure factor. A double wrap in a given thread weight produces a noticeably larger and rounder dot than a single wrap would, because the second wrap adds thread mass in both of the two horizontal dimensions around the needle shaft simultaneously.

The critical control variable in phanda is maintaining the thread in a perpendicular orientation above the needle shaft during the needle withdrawal. If the thread path is allowed to run at an angle across the needle shaft during withdrawal, one side of the double wrap closes more tightly than the other, producing an asymmetric dot that has one rounded side and one flattened or comma-shaped side. The correction is to hold the working thread vertically (at 90 degrees to the fabric plane) immediately above the exit point, and to maintain this hold until the needle tip has fully cleared the fabric on the back side. Once the needle is through, the thread can be released and the knot will settle into its final position under the fabric’s thread tension.

Murri uses a single wrap, not a double. This is one of the two defining differences. The needle exits at point A. The thread wraps once around the needle shaft. Then — and this is the defining second difference — the needle re-enters the fabric at point B, where B is located at a distance from A (not adjacent to A) and in the direction that the rice-grain shape is intended to point. The distance from A to B determines the length of the finished grain. A distance of two thread-widths from A to B produces a short rice grain. A distance of four to five thread-widths produces a clearly elongated grain with a visible aspect ratio. Longer distances produce proportionally longer grains.

The geometry of why this works: as the needle re-enters at B (which is farther from A than in phanda), the single thread wrap must span the distance between the exit and re-entry points while being drawn through. The wrap sits on the needle shaft at its midpoint, and the two yarn legs that form the wrap must reach from point A (where they originate) to point B (where they will enter the fabric). This span, combined with the slight bulk of the single wrap at the needle’s midpoint, is what creates the elongated shape: the wrap forms the body of the grain, and the two entry/exit points define the grain’s terminal ends.

The direction of the line from A to B is the orientation vector of the rice grain. In chikankari motifs — particularly in the petal and leaf elements of floral designs — murri stitches are conventionally oriented so the grain points radially toward the center of the motif or along the curve of the petal edge. This means that for different murri stitches within the same petal, the A-to-B direction varies: stitches near the petal tip point toward the tip, stitches along the curve point tangentially along the arc. Each murri stitch requires its own directional assessment within the design. For Patreon documentation, a pattern that uses murri cannot simply say “work murri throughout.” It must specify the exit-to-re-entry distance (in thread-widths or millimetres, with the thread weight specified), the orientation rule for each design element, and whether individual murri stitches in a group should be consistent in direction or varied in a specified way.

Jali pulled-thread openwork: thread displacement not thread removal, securing stitch mechanics, and why muslin thread count sets the minimum aperture floor

Jali is one of chikankari’s most recognizable features — the mesh window patterns that appear in completed pieces as geometric lattice inserts within larger floral or paisley designs. The single most important structural fact about jali is the one most commonly omitted from tutorial descriptions: jali does not remove any fabric threads. Every warp thread and every weft thread that existed in the muslin before the jali is worked is present in the muslin after the jali is completed. The open areas in jali are not vacancies where thread has been removed. They are zones where existing threads have been pushed apart from their original positions and locked in place in their new separated positions by securing stitches.

The structural contrast is with drawn thread work. In drawn thread embroidery (Hardanger embroidery, hemstitch, certain Eastern European folk techniques), warp or weft threads are literally cut and withdrawn from the fabric. The openwork areas in drawn thread work are genuine absences — material that was present has been removed. The mesh appearance comes from the threads that remain after removal, which are now exposed as isolated structural elements because their neighboring threads have been taken away. Jali produces a visually similar mesh appearance through a structurally opposite mechanism. Nothing is removed; everything is displaced. This distinction matters for durability (displaced threads stabilize themselves under surrounding fabric tension; vacated areas in drawn thread work can develop progressive distortion as remaining threads shift), for reversibility (jali can theoretically be partially undone by removing the securing stitches and allowing the displaced threads to return to their original positions, though in practice the displaced threads may have taken a set; drawn thread work is irreversible), and for the fabric specification required (drawn thread work requires a fabric that can withstand thread removal without fraying catastrophically; jali requires a fabric where the threads are individually displaceable, which means a weave structure loose enough for the stiletto to pass through without tearing fibers at the displacement point).

The jali process begins with the stiletto (a pointed tool with a rounded shaft cross-section) or a large-eye needle whose shaft is used as the displacing instrument. The tool is inserted into the fabric at the center of a warp-weft intersection — specifically, at the point where a warp thread and a weft thread cross — and rotated slightly while applying lateral pressure to push the threads apart. The goal is to create a circular hole by moving the warp threads to the left and right of the insertion point and the weft threads above and below it. The hole does not need to be perfectly circular, but the thread displacement should be approximately symmetrical in all four directions from the center point to produce a regular aperture.

Immediately after creating the displaced hole, a securing stitch is worked around its perimeter. The most common securing stitch for chikankari jali is a tight running stitch that passes around all four sides of the displaced hole, catching the displaced thread bundles on each side. The stitch is worked in a fine thread (typically the same thread or a finer thread than the bakhiya thread) and pulled with enough tension to prevent the displaced threads from returning toward the hole center but without such extreme tension that the securing stitch itself distorts the fabric around the hole. The securing stitch visually defines the aperture edge: the finished jali window in a completed chikankari piece is the displaced hole framed by the securing stitch, which appears as a slightly raised square or rectangular outline around each aperture.

The minimum jali aperture is not an aesthetic choice; it is a fabric-parameter floor. The smallest possible hole that can be created by stiletto displacement in a plain weave muslin corresponds to the displacement of a single warp-weft intersection. In a plain weave, the threads lie in a regular grid: each warp thread crosses each weft thread at evenly spaced intervals. The spacing between adjacent thread intersections — the thread pitch — is the inverse of the thread count (number of threads per unit length). For a muslin with 30 threads per centimetre in both directions, the thread pitch is approximately 0.33 millimetres. The minimum jali aperture in this muslin is approximately one thread pitch: a hole approximately 0.33 millimetres wide before the securing stitch is applied. After the securing stitch is applied, the effective aperture visible in the finished piece is somewhat smaller, as the securing stitch thread occupies some of the displaced space at the hole perimeter.

Finer muslin (higher thread count, smaller thread pitch) allows smaller minimum apertures. This is why traditional chikankari on fine tanzeb muslin achieves jali windows that appear as extremely fine mesh to the naked eye — the apertures are genuinely smaller because the muslin thread pitch is smaller. Coarser cotton fabric with a larger thread pitch forces larger minimum apertures. The difference is visible and cannot be mitigated by technique. A Patreon pattern specifying a jali design must include the fabric thread count as a design specification, not as a suggestion. Using coarser fabric than specified will produce a piece with visually larger jali holes, which changes the proportion of the design and the visual balance between the jali mesh areas and the surrounding bakhiya shadow work.

The thirty-two chikankari stitches in three categories: flat shadow, openwork, and mota raised, with the sequencing implications for multi-category design

Chikankari’s thirty-two recognized stitches organize into three structural categories that describe how each stitch relates to the fabric plane. The three categories are not merely a classification system; they have practical consequences for design execution order, thread selection, needle size, and the documentation requirements for Patreon patterns.

The flat-and-shadow category includes all stitches that work within or against the fabric plane. Bakhiya and ulta bakhiya form the shadow-work pair within this category. Bakhiya (wrong-side closed herringbone) produces shadow fill through the fabric. Ulta bakhiya is worked from the right side, producing the crossing herringbone pattern directly on the public face without fabric filtering — the crossing diagonals are on the surface rather than behind it, producing a heavier, more opaque, more directly textured fill than bakhiya. Ulta bakhiya is used in design areas that require stronger visual presence than bakhiya shadow fill provides, or where the design is to be worked on a non-sheer fabric where the shadow effect would not be visible regardless.

Phanda and murri, discussed above, are also flat-category stitches in the sense that they sit against the fabric surface and are not built up on padding foundations. Keel is a detached chain stitch used for small circular or elongated accent elements — floral centers, small oval leaves, short curved accents — in which a chain stitch loop is anchored at both ends by a small tying stitch but is not connected to adjacent chain stitches in a continuous chain. Sidhaul is stem stitch: the primary outline stitch used for curved branch lines, thin stem elements, and design contour lines that require consistent width along a curve. Pechni is a running stitch fill used for broad interior areas where solid coverage is needed quickly and the design does not require the shadow quality of bakhiya. Each of these flat stitches requires fine cotton thread and a needle small enough to pass through the muslin without distorting the weave at the penetration points.

The openwork category is dominated by jali and its named variants. Beyond the basic displaced-hole jali described in the previous section, several named jali patterns describe different arrangements of the holes and different secondary stitch treatments. Hath jali (hand jali, the simplest variant) creates regularly spaced displaced holes in a square or diagonal grid with simple securing stitches. The visual effect is an evenly distributed mesh. Makra jali (spider jali) adds a secondary crossing stitch worked across the interior of each displaced hole after the securing stitch is complete, connecting the four securing stitch edges with diagonal crossing threads that produce a spider-web or asterisk pattern within each aperture. This secondary stitch requires the aperture to be large enough to accommodate the needle crossing its interior — apertures created in very fine muslin at minimum displacement may be too small for the needle to cross the interior without the surrounding securing stitches deflecting the needle path. Jaali-kash uses a different displacement mechanism: the needle and tight-pulled stitches create the hole by stitch tension rather than by stiletto mechanical pressure, and the resulting apertures are more integrated with the securing stitch border because the displacement and the securing stitches happen in the same stitch action.

The mota (raised, dimensional) category uses padded construction to build stitches that stand above the fabric surface with visible height and tactile dimensionality. The foundational technique in this category is tepchi: rows of running stitch worked in parallel lines within the design area to create a slightly elevated padding base. The running stitch rows in tepchi are not the finished surface — they are a structural layer that elevates subsequent stitches above the base fabric plane. The tepchi rows must be worked in the same thread direction as the subsequent surface stitches to avoid visible ridge lines at right angles to the surface stitch direction. Once tepchi is in place, the surface stitches (ghas patti leaf stitch, satin stitch, or other raised fill stitches) are worked over the padding, and the height of the finished raised element is proportional to the number of tepchi layers used.

Ghas patti (grass or petal stitch) is worked over tepchi padding and produces a raised, smooth element with a convex cross-section visible in raking light. The stitch is a covering satin or long-and-short stitch laid over the tepchi rows, concealing the padding structure and presenting a smooth thread surface. The coverage direction of the ghas patti surface stitches must be consistent within each design element (all stitches parallel to each other) to produce a smooth reflective surface; varied stitch angles produce a matte, irregular surface texture that is the diagnostic for inconsistent ghas patti coverage direction.

The sequencing implication of three categories working together in the same design piece is the most practically important documentation point for Patreon patterns. The correct sequence is: design outline stitches first (sidhaul stem stitch borders if used), jali openwork second, bakhiya shadow fill third, mota raised elements last. Working in the reverse of any portion of this sequence creates problems that are difficult to correct. Jali worked after adjacent bakhiya is complete means the stiletto must operate near finished bakhiya stitches; the displacement tool can press against and distort bakhiya diagonal legs at the shared boundary, leaving permanently bent or misaligned stitches visible in the right-face shadow fill adjacent to the jali window. Mota raised elements worked before adjacent flat stitches are complete mean the elevated raised element physically obstructs the needle path for adjacent flat stitches, requiring the needle to navigate around the dimensional obstruction and producing irregularly spaced flat stitches near the mota boundary. Both of these sequencing errors produce results that cannot be corrected without completely removing the affected stitches, and removal from fine muslin leaves visible needle track marks at the penetration points.

Muslin thread count as a design parameter, and the taash blue chalk block transfer and its mirror-image requirement

Fabric thread count is not a background detail in chikankari documentation — it is a design parameter that directly constrains what stitches can be worked at what scale. This is most explicit in jali work (where thread count sets the minimum aperture floor, as discussed above), but it also affects bakhiya and the mota stitches.

For bakhiya, a muslin that is too coarse relative to the needle size causes the needle to push muslin threads aside during penetration rather than passing cleanly through the weave. Pushed-aside muslin threads at each bakhiya needle penetration point produce a slightly puckered appearance on the public right face, because the distorted muslin threads around the needle hole create irregular light-scattering geometry at the penetration site. This is visible as a faint texture difference between penetration points and the surrounding undisturbed fabric. On fine muslin at high thread count with an appropriately sized needle (fine enough that the needle shaft does not push threads aside), each penetration is invisible in the finished bakhiya area.

For mota stitches, a muslin that is too fine creates the opposite problem: the multiple parallel running stitch rows of tepchi padding accumulate thread bulk at the design area, and if the muslin thread count is very high (threads very close together), the multiple penetrations required for tepchi rows may begin to weaken the muslin at the closely spaced penetration sites. Traditional chikankari with mota elements used slightly coarser muslin in design areas that included substantial mota work, or used a cotton cambric (a slightly more tightly woven but also slightly heavier cotton) for pieces intended to have significant dimensional raised work.

The taash block transfer is the traditional method for placing the design on the fabric before embroidery begins. The taash is a carved wooden block — typically carved from sheesham (Indian rosewood) or another close-grained hardwood that holds fine detail — with the design elements carved in relief on the face. The block face is pressed onto a pad soaked in a blue pigment (historically indigo paste, now typically a washable blue chalk-based paste or a food-safe blue pigment) to load the relief surface with pigment. The block is then pressed firmly and evenly onto the muslin to transfer the design as a blue impression. Multiple block impressions may be required to cover the full design area, with each impression aligned to the adjacent one by eye or by registration marks at the block edges.

The mirror-image requirement is the structural fact about taash transfer that pattern-makers must address at the design stage, not at the transfer stage. When a carved block with a design in relief is pressed face-down onto fabric, the resulting impression on the fabric is the lateral (left-right) reverse of the design as it appears on the block face. This is the same mirror-reversal phenomenon that occurs in all relief printing: a rubber stamp, a woodblock print, a linoleum print. The image transfers as its mirror because the block contact reverses lateral orientation. For symmetric designs (bilateral symmetry about a vertical axis), the mirror reversal is invisible — the left side and right side of the design are identical, so their reversal on the fabric is indistinguishable from the original. For asymmetric designs — particularly paisley (buta) forms, floral sprays with directional growth, and text — the mirror reversal is significant. A chikankari buta pointing to the right in the intended design must be carved on the taash pointing to the left, so that the impression on the fabric points to the right. A taash carved with the intended design in the intended orientation (right-reading) will produce a fabric impression that is the mirror of the intention.

For Patreon creators who are transitioning from taash block transfer to modern alternatives (iron-on transfer paper, prick-and-pounce with powdered chalk, light box tracing, digital printing on water-soluble stabilizer), the mirror-image consideration applies differently to each method. Iron-on transfer paper designed for embroidery already accounts for the transfer reversal in its instruction set — the design is printed on the transfer paper in reverse and the heat application transfers it to the fabric in correct orientation. A pattern designed for taash transfer (where the designer already prepared the mirror image for the taash) may need to be additionally reversed before printing on iron-on transfer paper. Prick-and-pounce and light box tracing transfer the design in the orientation traced, so the design must be correctly oriented for the face being traced — tracing on the wrong side of the muslin for bakhiya work is common because the design must be on the working face (wrong side) and the prick-and-pounce chalk mark can then be seen as a guide from the working face without any reversal complication. The blue taash impression on the muslin is water-soluble and washes out completely after the embroidery is finished. This washout property is the reason chikankari is traditionally worked and finished by washing, and it is the reason that chikankari design transfer must use a pigment whose complete removal from the finished fabric is verified — a blue pigment that sets permanently in the fabric (as some dye-based blues do under heat) would leave permanent blue marks in the finished piece at any stitch-free areas within the design boundary.

The Apple Tax and chikankari Patreon creators

Chikankari embroidery has a distributed creator community across YouTube, Instagram, Pinterest, and Facebook. The YouTube segment includes both traditional artisans from Lucknow and the broader UP embroidery tradition who document the technique from the practitioner’s perspective, and Western hand embroidery educators who teach chikankari alongside other global embroidery traditions. Instagram hosts stitch detail photography — close-up images of completed bakhiya, jali, and mota work at sufficient resolution to see individual stitch geometry — as well as process reels from blank muslin through design transfer through stitching completion through washing and finishing. Pinterest serves as a design reference library for both historical chikankari patterns and contemporary applications on modern garment silhouettes.

The audience for chikankari content includes South Asian diaspora viewers for whom the craft is culturally familiar and emotionally significant, and Western hand embroidery practitioners for whom chikankari is a technically distinct and historically deep embroidery tradition. Both groups access content predominantly on mobile devices. The iOS device market share across these combined audience segments is consistent with the broader hand embroidery audience on each platform.

The platform iOS proportions for chikankari and traditional embroidery tutorial audiences: YouTube chikankari technique tutorials: 62 to 75 percent iOS. Instagram chikankari stitch detail and process accounts: 70 to 82 percent iOS. Pinterest chikankari pattern and design inspiration boards: 72 to 84 percent iOS. Facebook hand embroidery and chikankari technique groups: 60 to 72 percent iOS.

From November 1, 2026, Patreon passes Apple’s 30 percent App Store commission directly to creators rather than absorbing it into the platform fee. The commission applies to every patron subscription processed through the Patreon iOS app using Apple’s in-app purchase system. For a creator whose patrons are 74 percent iOS subscribers who subscribed through the Patreon app on their iPhone, 74 percent of their gross monthly revenue is subject to a 30 percent pass-through to Apple before the creator receives any payment.

Three representative monthly revenue calculations for chikankari Patreon creators. At $100 per month with 70 percent iOS: $100 × 0.70 × 0.30 equals $21.00 per month, which amounts to $252.00 per year permanently redirected from creator revenue to Apple beginning November 2026. At $200 per month with 74 percent iOS: $200 × 0.74 × 0.30 equals $44.40 per month, which amounts to $532.80 per year. At $350 per month with 78 percent iOS: $350 × 0.78 × 0.30 equals $81.90 per month, which amounts to $982.80 per year.

The mechanism that allows the Apple Tax to be avoided is web-only checkout. Apple’s in-app purchase requirement and commission apply only when a subscription is processed through a native iOS app using Apple’s payment infrastructure. A patron who opens a web browser on their iPhone — including mobile Safari, the default browser on iOS devices — and subscribes through a web payment form is using Stripe’s payment infrastructure. The Stripe transaction carries no Apple commission regardless of the device used to complete it. The patron can then access Patreon content through the Patreon iOS app without any further fee consequence: content access through the app does not trigger a new in-app purchase.

For chikankari creators, the Pinterest discovery pathway is particularly relevant. Pinterest content for chikankari patterns and finished-piece photographs performs well in image search, and a significant portion of Pinterest discovery happens when a user taps a pin and is taken to an external web page in the default mobile browser. A patron who arrives at a chikankari creator’s membership page through a Pinterest pin link is already in a browser context, and a web-checkout page captures this patron at full rates without any iOS commission.

KeepTier provides a hosted web-only membership page that routes all subscriptions through Stripe in a web browser regardless of the patron’s device and operating system. The November 1, 2026 deadline is public, fixed, and announced by Patreon.

START WITH THE NUMBER

Before you read about the tax, measure yours. Two inputs, one button, zero email capture.

Open the calculator →