What should stained glass creators offer on Patreon?

Stained glass creators on Patreon build retention when they document the technical decisions behind each piece rather than just showing the finished panel held up to light. The content that retains is the glass selection rationale (why this color and texture for this design area), the cutting documentation (scoring technique and pressure for this glass type, break mechanics), the structural method decision (foiling vs lead came and the specific design and installation criteria that drove the choice), and the soldering technique record. A two-tier structure suits most stained glass educators: a Process Documentation tier ($12–20/month) delivering cutting records, structural method rationale, soldering technique notes, and finished-piece photography with transmission and reflection photographs for each project; and a Pattern and Consultation tier ($30–50/month, capped at 8–10 patrons) adding original pattern PDF delivery and a quarterly project review where patrons submit a photograph of their current piece and the creator identifies technique problems and suggests corrections.

How should stained glass creators document glass cutting technique for Patreon?

Glass cutter scoring documentation covers three elements: the scoring sound and scratch appearance that confirm correct pressure, the oil lubrication protocol, and the break mechanics for curved vs straight cuts. Scoring sound: a correct score produces a clean hissing sound as the cutter wheel rolls through the glass surface; too much pressure produces a grinding or crunching sound and crushes the glass edge rather than scoring it cleanly; too little pressure produces a faint or silent scratch that will not break predictably. Document the sound description and the visual appearance of the score line (a correct score appears as a faint white scratch with no visible glass powder or chipping on either side of the line). Oil lubrication: the cutter wheel requires oil to reduce friction and extend wheel life. Self-oiling cutters hold oil in a reservoir; older cutters require manual oiling before each scoring session. Document the oil type used (cutting oil, kerosene, or a light mineral oil) and the oiling interval (every three to five cuts for non-self-oiling cutters). Break mechanics for straight cuts differ from curved cuts: straight cuts can be broken over a dowel or the edge of a table immediately after scoring; curved cuts require running the score (tapping along the underside of the score line with the ball end of the cutter to propagate a crack through the glass thickness) before breaking. Document which technique was used for each difficult cut in a project, because the break mechanics are where new stained glass makers most commonly lose glass to unexpected fractures.

How do stained glass creators document the foiling vs lead came decision for Patreon?

The foiling vs lead came decision is one of the most structurally significant choices in a stained glass project, and documenting the rationale teaches patrons to make the same decision rather than defaulting to whichever method they learned first. Copper foil (the Tiffany method) is appropriate for pieces with complex curves, small pieces, intricate designs with many tight angles, and three-dimensional forms (lampshades, jewelry). The copper foil wraps each individual glass piece, and the solder bonds to the foil and bridges between adjacent pieces; the solder joint is narrow and can follow complex outlines. Lead came is appropriate for larger pieces, straighter-lined designs, exterior installation, and traditionally styled work. Lead came provides structural rigidity through the lead channel itself (not the solder) and handles thermal expansion better for large exterior installations than copper foil. Document the piece size (dimensions and number of glass pieces), the complexity of the curves in the design, the intended installation location (interior only vs exterior or greenhouse), and the structural load consideration (a large exterior panel with the weight of the glass unsupported except by the came needs lead came's inherent rigidity; a small interior hanging piece can use copper foil without structural concern). The decision rationale stated explicitly in the Patreon post — 'I used lead came for this 24×30 inch panel rather than copper foil because the design uses primarily straight and gently curved lines, the panel will be installed in a casement window exposed to temperature variation, and lead came provides better structural support for a panel of this weight' — teaches the decision criteria rather than the mechanical execution.

How should stained glass creators document soldering technique for Patreon patrons?

Soldering documentation for stained glass Patreon covers iron temperature calibration, flux type and application, bead mechanics (flat bead vs raised bead), and the tinning vs building sequence. Iron temperature calibration: 60/40 solder (60% tin, 40% lead) flows at approximately 180–190°C; the iron tip temperature should be 260–315°C for normal soldering. Too cold and the solder does not flow onto the copper foil cleanly, producing a grainy, matte bead; too hot and the solder flows excessively, producing a flat puddle that spreads beyond the foil and creates surface pits as it cools too quickly. Document the iron temperature setting used (or the dial position if the iron does not display temperature) and the brand and tip type, because tip condition and tip style affect the working temperature significantly. Flux type and application: liquid flux (zinc chloride-based) activates the foil and allows solder to flow and bond; it must be applied fresh before soldering and cleaned off completely after soldering because residual flux is corrosive. Document the flux type (liquid vs paste), the application method (brush, syringe, or flux pen), and the cleaning protocol after soldering (neutralizing wash with baking soda and water, then rinse). Flat bead vs raised bead: a flat bead covers the foil edge with a thin, smooth layer of solder, appropriate for the back side of a panel where structural bonding is the goal rather than appearance. A raised bead builds up above the foil surface in a rounded dome, covering the foil width and producing the characteristic solder line appearance. Document the iron motion for a raised bead: the iron tip should move smoothly along the solder line without stopping, with solder fed continuously from the spool, applying just enough heat to keep the solder flowing without overheating. The tining step (the first pass of thin solder to bond the foil surfaces) precedes the bead pass.

How does the Apple Tax affect stained glass creator Patreons starting November 2026?

Stained glass creator iOS rates by platform: YouTube stained glass cutting and soldering tutorials, 55–65% iOS. Stained glass tutorial audiences include both casual craft discovery viewers (high iOS) and active learners who often watch in their workshop on a tablet or phone (moderate iOS). Instagram stained glass finished panel photography: 70–80% iOS — light-transmission photographs and pattern photography are visually compelling mobile content. TikTok stained glass creation and assembly: 70–80% iOS — the transformation from glass sheets to finished panel performs consistently on TikTok. The Apple Tax on November 1, 2026: Patreon applies Apple's 30% IAP fee to all iOS subscriptions. At $300/month with 60% iOS: approximately $54/month ($648/year). At $400/month with 65% iOS: approximately $78/month ($936/year). At $200/month with 70% iOS (Instagram-primary stained glass creator): approximately $42/month ($504/year). The fix: enable Patreon's web-only billing toggle before October 31, 2026. Update Instagram bio, YouTube channel link, and TikTok bio to the Patreon web URL. Verify with a test subscription from Safari on iPhone before the November deadline.

Guides · 2026-06-26

Patreon for stained glass creators: glass cutting documentation, foiling vs lead came structural decisions, soldering mechanics, iOS rates, and the Apple Tax in 2026

Stained glass Patreons retain when they document the technical decisions behind each panel — the scoring technique calibration, the structural method rationale, the soldering mechanics documented at the iron temperature and bead type level. Stained glass audiences are YouTube and Instagram-primary with moderate to high iOS rates; Apple Tax exposure begins November 1, 2026.

What stained glass creators offer on Patreon

Stained glass creators on Patreon build retention when they document the decisions behind each piece. The process video shows the cutter wheel moving across the glass and the solder flowing smoothly; the Patreon post explains why this glass was cut with a specific pressure and oil lubrication, why lead came was chosen over copper foil for this panel, and how the soldering temperature was calibrated for this solder composition.

A two-tier structure suits most stained glass educators. Process Documentation tier ($12–20/month): cutting records, structural method rationale, soldering technique notes, and finished-piece photography with both transmission (light through the glass) and reflection (glass in room light) photographs for each project. Pattern and Consultation tier ($30–50/month, capped 8–10 patrons): same documentation plus original pattern PDF delivery for each project and a quarterly project review — patron submits a photograph of their current piece with a description of the problem they are encountering, and the creator identifies the technique issue and suggests a correction.

Glass cutting: scoring technique and break mechanics

Glass cutter documentation begins with the scoring sound and scratch appearance, which are the primary feedback mechanisms for correct pressure calibration. A correct score produces a clean hissing sound as the cutter wheel rolls through the glass; too much pressure produces a grinding or crunching sound and crushes the glass edge rather than scribing it cleanly; too little pressure produces a faint or silent scratch that will not break predictably.

The visual appearance of the score line confirms the sound assessment: a correctly scored line appears as a faint white scratch with no visible glass powder or chipping on either side. Visible chipping on both sides of the score line indicates excessive pressure; a barely visible or absent white line indicates insufficient pressure. Document the glass type and thickness being scored (cathedral glass, opalescent glass, textured glass, and English streaky glass all have different surface hardness and require slight pressure adjustments) and the score appearance for each type.

Oil lubrication is the second cutting variable: the cutter wheel requires light oil to reduce friction and extend the wheel’s functional life. Self-oiling cutters hold oil in a handle reservoir and apply it automatically through a wick; traditional steel wheel cutters require manual oiling before each scoring session. Document the oil type (cutting oil, kerosene, or light mineral oil) and the interval (every three to five cuts for non-self-oiling cutters). Patrons who are using an older cutter without an oil reservoir and scoring dry will encounter premature wheel wear and inconsistent breaks without knowing why; the documentation teaches the variable they are missing.

Break mechanics for straight cuts differ from curved cuts. Straight cuts: break over a dowel, breaking pliers, or the edge of the workbench immediately after scoring (within a minute, while the score is fresh). Curved cuts require running the score before breaking — tapping along the underside of the score line with the ball end of the cutter, starting from one end and working toward the other, to propagate a crack through the glass thickness without breaking through. After running the score, gently flex the glass along the score line. Document which break technique was used for each difficult cut in a project, because the break mechanics are where new stained glass makers most commonly lose glass to unexpected fractures.

Foiling vs lead came: structural decision documentation

The structural method decision is one of the most instructive pieces of documentation a stained glass Patreon can deliver, because tutorials typically teach one method or the other without explaining the criteria for choosing between them. The explicit rationale stated for each project teaches patrons to make the decision for their own work.

Copper foil (Tiffany method) is appropriate for pieces with complex curves, small glass pieces, intricate designs with many tight angles, and three-dimensional forms (lampshades, decorative boxes, jewelry). The copper foil wraps each individual glass piece; the solder bonds to the foil and bridges between adjacent pieces; the solder joint is narrow enough to follow complex curves. Copper foil is not appropriate for large exterior panels where thermal expansion and structural load are significant concerns, because the foil and solder provide only limited structural support for heavy glass panels exposed to temperature cycling.

Lead came is appropriate for larger pieces, designs with primarily straight or gently curved lines, exterior installation, and traditionally styled architectural work. The lead channel holds each glass piece mechanically (the glass is inserted into the channel groove); the solder at each joint bonds the lead came to itself, not primarily to the glass. Lead came panels handle thermal expansion better than foil panels for large exterior applications because the soft lead accommodates glass movement. Lead came is not practical for tight curves and small piece sizes because the channel width creates a visible border that is too wide for intricate patterns.

Document the decision for each project with the relevant criteria: piece dimensions, number of glass pieces, the complexity of the curves in the design, the intended installation (interior sunlight exposure only, exterior glazed opening, greenhouse, or three-dimensional form), and the structural load consideration. “I used copper foil for this 12×16 inch panel because the design includes tight curves in the floral elements and seven pieces smaller than one inch across, both of which require the narrow solder line that foiling provides” teaches the threshold more clearly than any general description.

Soldering documentation: iron temperature, flux, bead mechanics

Soldering documentation covers four elements: iron temperature calibration, flux type and application, the bead construction sequence, and the cleaning protocol.

Iron temperature calibration: 60/40 solder (60% tin, 40% lead) flows at approximately 180–190°C; the iron tip should be at 260–315°C for normal stained glass soldering. Too cold: the solder does not flow onto the copper foil cleanly, producing a grainy, matte bead with poor adhesion. Too hot: the solder flows excessively, spreads beyond the foil, and may pit as it cools too rapidly. Document the iron temperature setting used and the iron brand and tip type, because tip condition and tip geometry affect the working temperature at the glass surface significantly. A freshly tinned tip transfers heat more efficiently than an oxidized tip at the same nominal setting.

Flux type and application: liquid flux (zinc chloride-based) activates the copper foil surface and allows solder to wet and bond. Apply fresh before soldering; flux that has sat on the glass for more than a few minutes may oxidize and provide inadequate activation. Document the flux type, application method (brush, syringe, or flux pen), and the area coverage — some creators apply flux to the entire piece before starting; others apply section by section to prevent the flux from drying or oxidizing before the iron reaches it. Cleaning protocol after soldering is non-negotiable: residual flux is corrosive and must be removed completely. Document the cleaning solution (neutralizing wash with baking soda and water, rinse, then dry) and the timing (clean within an hour of completion).

Flat bead vs raised bead: the back of a panel receives a flat bead — a thin, smooth layer of solder covering the foil edges, providing structural bonding without building up above the surface. The front of a panel receives a raised bead — a rounded dome built up above the foil width, covering the foil completely and producing the characteristic solder line appearance. The iron motion for a raised bead: tip moves smoothly along the solder line without stopping; solder fed continuously from the spool; just enough heat to keep the solder flowing without overheating. Document the motion type (continuous motion vs stop-and-flow), the solder feed rate, and any areas of the piece where bead construction required a different technique (tight angles, small pieces with converging foil lines, areas near the panel edge).

Tipping sequence: the tining pass (or tacking pass) lays a thin first layer of solder to bond the foil surfaces before the bead is built. Trying to build a raised bead without first tining the foil typically produces a lumpy uneven bead because the solder pools at spots where the foil was not pre-bonded. Document whether tining was done as a separate pass.

Apple Tax for stained glass creator audiences

Stained glass creator iOS rates by platform: YouTube stained glass tutorials, 55–65% iOS. Instagram finished panel photography, 70–80% iOS. TikTok stained glass creation, 70–80% iOS.

The Apple Tax on November 1, 2026: at $300/month with 60% iOS, approximately $54/month ($648/year). At $400/month with 65% iOS: approximately $78/month ($936/year). At $200/month with 70% iOS (Instagram-primary creator): approximately $42/month ($504/year).

Enable Patreon’s web-only billing toggle before October 31, 2026. Update all bio links to the Patreon web URL. Verify with a test subscription from Safari on iPhone.

More explainers on Patreon fees and Apple Tax · Patreon for visual artists · Patreon for watercolor artists

KeepTier is a self-hosted membership page for creators who want 100% of their tier revenue and zero Apple tax. Plans start at $9/month.